FundedKeys

Leeloo Trading risk calculator

Size every trade on the Leeloo Trading Foundation (LL) $100K from its real capital: the $3,000 max drawdown, not the $100K account. See how many losing trades end the day and the account, then run your plan 10,000 times under Leeloo Trading's own rules.

Your three numbers

Risk a trade$1503 MNQ (20 points stop)
Your day
  • stop after 2 losses
  • stop at −$750
The odds59%reach the target · typical 78 days

Today

Leeloo Trading Foundation (LL) $100K
Trades at most3
Risk a trade$1503 MNQ (20 points stop)
Stop at−$300after 2 losses in a row

Before each trade

Leeloo Trading Foundation (LL) $100K

Advanced blocks hidden

Your real capital is $3,000, not $100,000: no daily loss limit is stated, 20 end the account. Size every trade so a normal losing streak cannot reach that limit, and set a daily limit of your own.

The loss side

your edge: +0.13R · $19 a trade on average
Losing trades in a row to hit the daily limit
—no daily limit stated

The firm states no daily limit: yours is the only one.

Losing trades in a row to lose the account
20$3,000 ÷ $150

Trailing: the floor rises with your best balance, so after a run of wins it takes fewer.

Expect a run of
8 losses· 1 in 10 runs sees 11

Over a typical run of 237 trades at a 55% loss rate, a losing streak of 8 or more happens in 59% of runs and one of 11 or more in 13%. The account ends at 20 losses in a row.

Losses in a rowAll lose nextIn a dayIn 100 tradesIn a typical run
2 · Your stopends the day by your choice30%44%100%100%
20 · Max drawdownthe account is lost1 in 155,864—1 in 4,2131 in 1,580

“All lose next” is the chance that the coming trades are all losers. The other three columns are the chance that such a streak happens at least once: in a day of 3 trades, in 100 trades, and in a typical run of 237 trades (the simulation's median), the streak that ends accounts. All are exact, from your win rate.

The gain side

1 phase · $225 a win
Winning trades to reach the target
2727 × $225

Net of losses it takes more trades: the simulation counts them.

Reached before losing the account
59%of 10,000 runs

Trade by trade at your win rate, under the firm's rules and your limits.

Winning trades in a rowChance in a rowWhat it means
27 wins of $225under 1 in a billionthe first target in one go: the one-day rush
14 wins of $2251 in 71,618half of the first target in one go

Consistency

Leeloo Trading states no consistency rule on this account: one strong day can count in full.

10,000 simulated challenges with your numbers

same seed every time

Assumes a fixed stop (−$150) and target (+$225), independent trades at a 45% win rate, the same size every trade, $0 of costs a trade, no slippage; Leeloo Trading's rules as published, checked Sep 30, 2026.

What this does not model

Variable R (stops and targets that move) · partial exits · news gaps · slippage · correlated trades · the firm's discretion · taxes.

Reached the target 58.5%Daily limit hit 0.0%Max drawdown hit 16.2%Blocked by consistency 0.0%Still trading after 120 days 25.3%
Median days to pass7810 minimum
9 in 10 pass within110 daysof the runs that pass
Expected cost to get funded$6301.7 accounts bought per pass · retries at the $85 reset · a monthly plan bills again each month: this counts the first
Typical run237 tradesuntil pass, fail or 120 days
Buying 1 account
At least one passes59%the chance one account passes
Funded on average0.59the share of attempts that pass
Total cost$4661 × $320, plus $250 for each that passes
Cost per funded account$797the total ÷ the accounts that pass

The same strategy copied onto several accounts shares one outcome: they pass or fail together, so the odds above do not improve. Trading opposite sides across accounts to push one through (“hedged passing”) is prohibited by the firms that state a rule on it, and this planner never suggests it.

These figures treat each account as its own attempt, the best case, with the chance of one attempt from the simulation above. Each account is bought once: resets are not counted. A monthly plan bills again each month: these figures count the first month of each account.

Copies plan A into plan B: change a number of B and read both columns.
50 runs and where 80% of all runs stand, day by day
passedmax drawdowndaily limitblocked by consistencystill trading80% of runsmedian
Days to pass

Every rule this planner applies is published for this account. Other rules (news trading, time limits, a minimum profit for a day to count, scaling) are not simulated: read the firm's own page.

After you pass

Investor Performance Account

Funded from a fresh start, with your numbers: 10,000 runs trade until the first payout can be asked for, the account is lost, or 120 days pass.

Reach a first payout92%of 10,000 funded runs, within 120 days
Median days to it30needs $1,000 of profit, 30 trading days and best day at most 30% of the profit
Lost before it6.8%floor or daily limit hit
Still waiting0.9%no payout after 120 days
First payout, net$1,800all of the profit × 100% split · at $1,800 of profit
Payouts to repay the price1$320 paid + $250 after passing
Timeline, in days
  1. Passday 78
  2. First payoutday 108
  3. Second payoutday 138
What this stage publishes
Profit split
100% of the first $12,500, then 90%
Payouts
every 30 days
First payout
after 30 trading days
Minimum payout
$1,000
Consistency
30%
Funded account
no daily loss limit

Not published by the firm, so left out of this run: the payout cap (a request may take all the profit). A day here is a trading day, counted as one day of the firm's own day rules.

Cost to get funded

price, resets, fee after passing
Expected cost
$630

1.7 attempts on average: $320 for the first, $85 for each of the others, plus $250 after passing

Budget for 3 attempts
$740

Nine times in ten one of these 3 attempts passes: $320 for the first, then $85 each time, plus $250 after passing

A reset costs $85: each attempt after the first is counted at that price. a monthly plan bills again each month: this counts the first

Ways to size, compared

your plan 10,000 runs · the others 5,000 each
Way to sizeReachedAccount lostDaily limit hitMedian days
Same size every tradeyour plan as set58.5%16.2%0.0%78
Half size near the floorwhen less than a third of the drawdown is left57.7%7.7%0.0%78
Half size after 2 lossesback to full size after a win47.7%9.0%0.0%85
Build a buffer firsthalf size until up half the drawdown35.8%2.7%0.0%91

The same trades, sized four ways. Half size when the floor gets close is the most common advice: it trades a little speed for fewer lost accounts. The best figure of each column is in accent.

If you risked…

your row 10,000 runs · the others 2,000 each
Risk a tradeReachedAccount lostMedian daysCost to get funded
1% of the drawdown$30 a trade0.0%0.0%——
2.5% of the drawdown$75 a trade5.8%0.3%105$1,951
5% of the drawdownyour plan$150 a trade58.5%16.2%78$630
7.5% of the drawdown$225 a trade61.1%37.3%49$624
10% of the drawdown$300 a trade50.5%49.5%31$653

The same win rate, reward, stops and rules at other sizes of risk: only the risk changes. Your own row is the simulation above; the best figure of each column is in accent.

The drawdown floor

trailing
How the floor moves
With every trade

It follows your best balance, $3,000 below it, and never stops rising.

It never locks
—

Every new high raises the line for good: keep a fixed buffer and take profits off the table with payouts.

Rushing against your plan

the same win rate and reward
MeasureYour planRushing
Risk per trade5.0% of the drawdown · $150100% of the drawdown · $3,000
Your limitsonnone
Reached58.5%0.0%
Daily limit hit0.0%0.0%
Account lost16.2%100.0%
Expected cost to get funded$630 · 1.7 accounts bought per passno run passed

Rushing sizes each trade so an average day makes the first target in one session ($6,000 in 3 trades, capped here at your whole drawdown: one loss ends the account). This account needs 10 trading days anyway. Same win rate, same reward: only the size and the limits change.

Kelly and the risk of ruin

what the formulas say
Full Kelly8.3% · $250
Half Kelly4.2% · $125
Quarter Kelly2.1% · $63
Your risk5.0% · $150

Kelly = win rate − loss rate ÷ reward = 0.45 − 0.55 ÷ 1.5 = 8.3% a trade, applied here to your real capital, the $3,000 drawdown. Full Kelly grows fastest with deep swings on the way; most traders use a quarter to a half of it. You are at 0.6 Kelly: above half, losing runs get long.

Risk of ruin, trading on forever
3.7%

The chance a losing run eats the whole drawdown (20 losses of room) if you traded these numbers without end, on one account.

Lost before the target, simulated
16.2%

The real figure for this account: its daily limit and its targets included.

Risk of ruin ≈ e^(−r × U), where U is the losses of room (the drawdown ÷ the risk of one trade) and r solves p · e^(−r × reward) + q · e^(r) = 1 (p the win rate, q the loss rate). Kelly and ruin assume trades of the same size, one after another.

My plan

keep it beside your chart, share it
MY PLAN · Leeloo Trading Foundation (LL) $100K
Risk per trade: 5.0% of the $3,000 drawdown ($150) · reward 1.5R · win rate 45% (my estimate)
Position: 3 MNQ (20 points stop)
Stop for the day: after 2 losses in a row or at −$750
Stop for the day when up: no cap
The firm states no daily limit and ends the account after 20 losses in a row (1 in 1,580 over a typical run)
Simulated with these numbers: 59% reach the target, median 78 days
Rules from leelootrading.com, checked Sep 30, 2026 · fundedkeys.com/tools/risk-planner

The card is this plan's share image: posted in Discord, Telegram or X, the link opens this exact plan.

Each run trades your numbers under the account's rules: its daily loss limit, its max drawdown (static, trailing, end of day or locking at the starting balance as the firm states it), its targets, its minimum days and its consistency rule, and under your own limits. A rule the firm does not publish is left out and named. Rules of the accounts are data of Oct 5, 2026. A calculation, not a promise. Check your own days in the consistency calculator

Leeloo Trading risk questions, answered from its rules

How much should I risk per trade on Leeloo Trading's $100K account?

Risk a share of the $3,000 max drawdown, not of the $100K: that $3,000 is what the Leeloo Trading Foundation (LL) $100K can lose before it ends, so it is your real capital. At 5% of it a trade risks $150 (0.15% of the account); 2.5% is $75 and 10% is $300. With a 45% win rate and rewards of 1.5R, 59% of 10,000 simulated runs reach the target and 16% lose the account. A calculation, not a promise.

How many losing trades in a row end the day or the account on Leeloo Trading's $100K account?

Leeloo Trading states no daily loss limit on this account, so only the max drawdown ends it: at 5% of the drawdown a trade ($150), 20 losses in a row reach the $3,000 max drawdown. Trailing: the floor rises with your best balance, so after a run of wins it takes fewer. Over a typical run of 237 trades at a 55% loss rate, a losing streak of 8 or more happens in 59% of runs and one of 11 or more in 13%; a streak of 20 has a 1 in 1,580 chance of happening in such a run.

Does Leeloo Trading have a time limit or a consistency rule on the $100K account?

Leeloo Trading states no time limit for the Leeloo Trading Foundation (LL) $100K. There is no consistency rule. At least 10 trading days are required.

What does Leeloo Trading's $100K account cost to get funded, with retries?

The Leeloo Trading Foundation (LL) $100K costs $320 (list price). A fee of $250 is paid once, after passing. At the opening plan (5% of the drawdown a trade, 45% wins, 1.5R), 59% of attempts reach the target: 1.7 accounts bought per pass. Counting each retry at $85 (retries at the $85 reset), the expected cost is $630, and $740 covers 3 attempts, enough to be funded nine times in ten. It is a monthly plan: it bills again each month, and these figures count the first month only.

Opened on the Leeloo Trading Foundation (LL) $100K: the Leeloo Trading account of $100K with the lowest real cost, $190.00 per $1,000 of drawdown. Change it in the picker above.

Rules and sources: Leeloo Trading review · Risk planner for every firm · consistency calculator · methodology